Apple has filed a motion with the court expressing its willingness to explore options for an amicable resolution of the dispute with Epic Games. This request comes at a time when Apple has proposed a new commission structure for purchases made outside the in-app payment system of the App Store in the U.S.
Apple proposes a settlement conference
Apple's legal representatives have asked Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to order a settlement conference under the supervision of Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Apple stated that it attempted to reach an agreement with Epic's lawyers before filing the motion, but Epic did not consent to this request.
Apple argues that the court has the authority to order such a conference even without the other party's consent. According to the company, discussions in a confidential and non-confrontational environment could increase the chances of a practical resolution. This would likely avoid lengthy litigation.
Dispute over App Store commission rates
The current conflict revolves around fees for alternative payment systems. Apple has proposed commissions of up to 15% for purchases made outside the App Store. Epic Games immediately rejected this proposal. The company claims that these fees exceed the guidelines set by the Ninth Circuit.
The entire process is taking place in a tense atmosphere. The Supreme Court denied Apple's request to stay proceedings in the lower court. This concerns Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers' ruling on Apple's contempt for charging a 27% commission despite being required to allow developers to include links to external payment methods.
The filed motion for a settlement conference does not contain specific offers or conditions for a potential peace. It is merely a request to initiate talks under judicial supervision.